 |
当前位置：首页 >> 个人服务 >> 预览个人简历信息 提醒：任何一种简历保密设置，都不会影响您在线投递简历。 |
|
| 个人信息 |
| 姓 名： |
孟译员 [编号]:814 |
性 别： |
男 |
|
| 擅长专业： |
环境工程 |
出生年月： |
1983/9/1 |
|
| 民 族： |
汉族 |
所在地区： |
上海 上海 |
|
| 文化程度： |
本科 |
所学专业： |
环境工程 |
|
| 毕业时间： |
39243 |
毕业学校： |
苏州科技学院 |
|
| 第一外语： |
英语 |
等级水平： |
英语六级 |
|
|
| 口译等级： |
中级 |
工作经历： |
1 年 |
|
|
| 翻译库信息 |
| 可翻译语种： |
英语 |
|
|
| 目前所在地： |
上海 上海 |
| 可提供服务类型： |
笔译 |
| 每周可提供服务时间： |
每周能够提供定额的翻译完成量，希望能够长期合作（兼职）。 |
| 证书信息 |
| 证书名称： |
大学英语六级证书 |
|
| 获证时间： |
2007/6/1 |
|
| 获得分数： |
439 |
|
|
| 工作经历 |
| 工作时期： |
2008/10/1--2009/6/1 |
|
| 公司名称： |
保密 |
|
| 公司性质： |
其它 |
| 所属行业： |
其他 |
| 所在部门： |
其他 |
|
| 职位： |
其他 |
| 自我评价： |
有较强的文字翻译能力，已经通过大学英语六级，现工作之余有点时间想兼职 |
|
|
| 笔译案例信息 |
| 案例标题： |
文化相对论 |
|
| 原文： |
Basically, the author proposed cultural difference dialectical, itself also has may discuss place. The author in the article proposed the shape of the earth example, showed "did not believe" certainly does not represent "does not exist", therefore "each kind of culture has the different opinion" certainly not to represent "not the objective moral standard". But such proof example, from "the knowledge stratification plane which may know" talks about "each kind of cultural custom", actually is the quite different two kind of situations; Because the shape of the earth is may use each method to perform to confirm, finally may obtain a correct answer; But the moral standard actually is different from person to person, even if really has absolutely the objective truth which changes along with the culture, also should take what kind of culture as the standard? The morals certainly do not like the scientific knowledge to be allowed to perform to confirm.
In addition, since the cultural relativism advocated the culture does not have division of the fit and unfit quality, that □first mentioned the slave system with slaughtered the Jew behavior itself already was one kind of cultural and race's Social Darwinism; The author proposed we should criticize Nazi Germany and the slave system not the moral behavior, because these two all is believed the itself culture which but these two kind of situations all are under "the culture has leaving of the fit and unfit quality" the overhead construction the shape model become surpasses it to plant the nationality (not to gather with cultural theory of relativity basic essential factor), therefore, perhaps we should reinspect Nazi Germany and the slave system all sorts of atrocities causal relation. If the world all can generally use the cultural relativism, perhaps that □did not have the question which above produced.
The author certainly not extremely approves of the cultural theory of relativity the argument, he proposed accepts one of cultural theory of relativity prices, is "we cannot criticize some social again the custom in" the morals "on more inferior, because does not have any objective standard existence." But cultural theory of relativity therefore can have this argument, should be thought each kind of culture all has its originality and the full value. Each kind of culture constructs the construction, all has its unique historical background perhaps with the living conditions related, therefore any different culture makes the comparison, all should not but make the critique take my race culture as the center to other cultural values, but is should by the objective standpoint, looks at different cultural from the objective angle the custom and the tradition, not only must think its cultural tradition is assorted □, but also must look for is assorted □can form such traditional custom, regarding is different with own any culture, all some sympathetic understanding, perhaps that so-called objective standard existence or not, No longer that □was important.
The author emphasized even if the different culture all should have a common moral principle, also is so-called "the universal truth", perhaps but this only can say is mutual recognition which in this world majority of people achieves together, that □is only approved by the major part person, is the universal truth?
|
|
| 译文： |
基本上，作者所提出的文化差异辨证，本身也有可议之处。作者在文中提出地球形状的例子，来说明『不相信』并不代表『不存在』，因此「各种文化有不同意见」并不代表「没有客观道德标准」。不过这样的论证的例子，从「可知的知识层面」谈到「各种文化的习俗」，却是相当不同的两种情形；因为地球形状是可以用各种方法加以验证的，最终可以得到一个正确答案；但是道德标准却是因人而异、随文化而变的，即使真有绝对客观的真理，又应该以何种文化为标准呢?道德并不像科学知识般可以加以验证的。
此外，既然文化相对主义主张文化没有优劣之分，那麼第一点提到的奴隶制度与屠杀犹太人的行为本身就已经是一种文化与人种的社会达尔文主义；作者提出我们应该批判纳粹德国与奴隶制度的不道德行为，不过这两种情形都是在「文化有优劣之别」的架构下所形塑而成的，因为这两者都是相信本身文化优於它种民族(与文化相对论的基本要素不合)，因此，也许我们应该重新检视纳粹德国与奴隶制度种种暴行的因果关系。如果世界都能普遍采用文化相对主义，那麼或许就没有上述所产生的问题了。
作者并不十分赞同文化相对论的论点，他提出接受文化相对论的代价之一，就是「我们不能再去批判某一个社会的习俗在「道德」上较低劣的，因为没有任何客观的标准存在。」但文化相对论之所以会持有这论点，应该是认为每一种文化都具有其独创性和充分的价值。每一种文化的建构，都有其独特的历史背景或是跟生活环境有关，所以任何不同文化做比较，都不应该以我族文化为中心而对其他文化的价值观作批判，而是应该以客观的立场，从客观的角度去看不同文化的习俗和传统，不仅要看它的文化传统是什麼，还要看为什麼会形成这样的传统习俗，对於不同於自己的任何文化，都有一份同情理解，或许那所谓的客观标准的存在与否，就不再那麼重要了。
作者强调即使不同文化都应该有一个共通的道德原则，也就是所谓的「普遍真理」，但是这或许只能说是这世界上的大部分人所共同达成的共识，那麼只被大部份人认同的，就算是普遍的真理吗？ |
|
|
|
|
